Rita Ora seems to ignore the controversial Twitter response of Iggy Azalea towards her idea of remaking the "Lady Marmalade," which some of the fans think isn't getting anywhere.

It has been reported earlier that the British singer wanted to create another "Lady Marmalade," a song that first debuted in 1974 but was popularized by Christina Aguilera, Mya, Lil' Kim and Pink in 2001. Ora told The Sun publication that she would like Miley Cyrus, Charli XCX and Iggy Azalea to join her, Mail Online learned.

"Please leave me out of the whole Lady Marmalade conversation. I have nothing to do with Rita's ideas & agree it should be left alone. Thanks," the Aussie rapper tweeted, Monday.

"The X Factor UK" judge posted a couple of things on her Twitter account, since the "Beg For It" singer's rather contentious tweet — such as her best friend getting married, her Wonderland Mag cover shoot, voting for MTV EMA best look and release of her NYC diary tour — but never did any of her succeeding tweets mention Azalea or the song.

Contrary to the "Fancy" singer's response, her song collaborator Charli XCX may have seemed to put it into consideration. The "Boom Clap" singer took it on Twitter and expressed her support for Ora's idea, but Huff Post Entertainment found out that the tweet was then deleted.

Meanwhile, some fans were open to the idea of the song remake. However, there were others who thought it would not get anywhere.

One fan commented on Azalea's post that something that iconic could not be recreated. While another fan tweeted, "I don't want another remake of that song anyway the one with Christina, Pink, Lil Kim, Mya deserves to be the only one."

There was another fan who agreed with the rapper's decision of staying out of the remake idea, saying it was senseless.

"Black Widow" was Ora and Azalea's collaboration in 2014. At the time of the release, both artists reportedly spoke of their shared their musical style and friendship.

So, what do you guys think? Did Rita Ora not see Iggy Azalea's tweet or is she intentionally ignoring it?