Whether it wins or loses, the Justice Department's lawsuit could force Apple to share sensitive and detailed information on its inner workings.
Apple, known for its secrecy, meticulously shapes its image by sharing only favorable details to make its products and practices look good. However, in business lawsuits, discovery allows access to the company's email, reports, and documents, some of which remain confidential, while others are disclosed publicly during trials.
Apple's Antitrust Lawsuit
The Justice Department unveiled a comprehensive antitrust lawsuit on Thursday against Apple, which alleges the tech company had an illegal monopoly in the smartphone industry, preventing competitors, stifling innovation, and maintaining artificially high prices.
Filed in federal court in New Jersey, the lawsuit claims that Apple holds monopoly power in the smartphone market and uses its control over the iPhone to engage in "a broad, sustained, and illegal course of conduct."
Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco accused Apple of locking consumers into the iPhone and locking competitors out of the market, thereby stifling industry advancement of the market it revolutionized. Apple countered, labeling the lawsuit as incorrect factually and legally, and vowed to defend itself vigorously.
Apple's Challenges in Protecting Business Information
In past legal battles, Apple grappled with how to navigate such challenges. When it sued Samsung ten years ago, Apple had to disclose details like unreleased prototypes, market research, and its closely guarded design procedures.
The lawsuit revealed confidential details that other tech firms wished to keep private, prompting companies like Intel and Qualcomm to file motions to protect their business information. In 2005, Apple had to acknowledge unannounced products during legal proceedings to penalize individuals who leaked its product details.
The antitrust case may compel Apple to disclose further details of its business operations, although it could potentially keep its most sensitive arrangements confidential. An Apple representative informed Axios that not all new secrets would necessarily be revealed, saying they have handled numerous high-profile cases in the past 15 years and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has already had access to millions of documents during their investigation but only relied on familiar documents that have been publicly available.
Tech Firms' Antitrust Dilemma
Apple strongly dislikes making its business arrangements public, but this is a common challenge for many tech firms who have also dealt with choosing whether to fight or settle antitrust complaints or legal disputes.
Legal battles like the recent dispute between Apple and Epic Games can be uncomfortable for all involved. In that case, court documents exposed confidential information not just from Apple and Epic but also from Microsoft, Sony, and other companies.
In addition to the risk of sharing secrets, companies face the potential distraction of litigation if they end up in court instead of settling a lawsuit or avoiding it altogether.
Defending against legal action consumes time and energy, diverting attention from other priorities and reducing a company's willingness to take risks, which Microsoft encountered similarly during its extensive antitrust battles in Washington and Brussels.
In contrast, Intel adopted a cooperative approach with regulators while dominating the processor market for many years, which largely spared the company from the complexities of prolonged court battles.
RELATED ARTICLE: Qualcomm Faces Lawsuit Over Anti-Competitive Practices
